[tap-l] SKIP_ALL tests should not get hidden

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Tue Oct 30 05:46:30 EST 2007


On 30 Oct 2007, at 10:45, Andy Armstrong wrote:
>> However, TAP::Parser doesn't seem to have a &skip_all method
>> (returning boolean or explanation?  What if no skip reason given?).
>
> That appears to be correct :(

D'you want me to fix that or will you? I don't mind either way.

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten






More information about the tap-l mailing list