[tap-l] Test Anything Protocol as an IETF draft/RFC
Jeremiah C. Foster
jeremiah.foster at ericsson.com
Thu Jul 10 17:46:47 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:32 +0200, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
> Lisa Dusseault said:
> >
> > Hi Salve,
> >
> > Since you mention the IETF Standards Track specifically, I guess you're
> > looking for a Proposed Standard RFC that has been published through the
> > IETF consensus process, which typically involves a Working Group (WG).
>
> Before continuing this, could we please have a couple of opinions
> expressed on the topic? (For posteriority, if nothing else.) Some of you
> have already said something positive (or mumbled something negative,) now
> let's get it into the archives. :)
>
> A simple +1, 0 or -1 with reason (the Apache way) should suffice.
>
> ------------------======oOo======------------------
>
> Do we want to work for an IETF stamp of approval (presumably in the form
> of an RFC someday) on the TAP specification?
>
> +1
+1 - It is already widely used, a standard would be useful.
Jeremiah
More information about the tap-l
mailing list