[tap-l] TODO Tests

[Aristotle Pagaltzis]

* Ovid <publiustemp-perlqa3 at yahoo.com> [2008-05-12 11:35]:
> Alternatively, persistent TAP could potentially track TODO
> results and handle the $WAS for you, but this is quite a ways
> off and has the problem that we cannot always identify which
> tests are which.

Plus, you still need a way to specify which results conform to
expectations and which don’t.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>