[tap-l] What's with verbose rewriting the TAP?

[Alex Vandiver]

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:49 +0000, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2009, at 13:31, Michael Peters wrote:
> > But it really should be the default, IMO. Normalizing data is an  
> > extra step that doesn't really give
> > any benefit unless you're trying to track down why TAP::Harness is  
> > interpreting your TAP as
> > something other than you intended, right?
> 
> OK :)

A quick pass at a patch attached.  No tests failed as a result of this
change, which means we need more tests. :)
 - Alex

-- 
Networking -- only one letter away from not working
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: raw-tap.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4125 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://testanything.org/pipermail/tap-l/attachments/20090219/c0c1a0e0/attachment.bin