[tap-l] What's with verbose rewriting the TAP?

[Andy Armstrong]

On 19 Feb 2009, at 15:31, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:49 +0000, Andy Armstrong wrote:
>> On 19 Feb 2009, at 13:31, Michael Peters wrote:
>>> But it really should be the default, IMO. Normalizing data is an
>>> extra step that doesn't really give
>>> any benefit unless you're trying to track down why TAP::Harness is
>>> interpreting your TAP as
>>> something other than you intended, right?
>>
>> OK :)
>
> A quick pass at a patch attached.  No tests failed as a result of this
> change, which means we need more tests. :)


Thanks!

Please commit it and I'll take a look tonight - particularly at why it  
doesn't break anything :)

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten